Policy Insight

APRA CPS 230 Compliance Standards

Operational oversight for third-party and fourth-party risk across critical business services.

Home · Customers · APRA CPS 230 Compliance Standards
Overview

CPS 230 raises the standard for operational oversight across business, IT, and suppliers

APRA is using CPS 230 to bring greater control into operational risk management where failures can emerge through mission-critical business services, outsourced providers, and downstream fourth parties. The standard expects organisations to understand who is accountable, which controls protect continuity, and how supplier obligations are monitored in practice.

StandardAPRA CPS 230
FocusOperational risk management
ScopeThird and fourth parties
NeedBoard-visible service accountability
Regulatory drivers

APRA is targeting the operational gaps that traditional compliance can miss

Control and monitoring of failures

Ineffective controls and siloed monitoring can allow IT and business operational risk events to reach critical services.

Intolerance for disruption

Customers and users now expect digital services to perform continuously, not simply recover after disruption.

Provider dependency

APRA-regulated organisations rely on a concentrated set of providers and subcontractors to keep business operations running.

Contractual obligation oversight

Supplier obligations need to be monitored as live operating commitments, not left as static contractual language.

Ikara response

Ikara makes CPS 230 accountability operational, measurable, and visible

Map controls to services

Connect operational controls and service warranties to the critical business services they are designed to protect.

Assign clear accountability

Allocate obligations to independent or interdependent internal teams, contractors, service providers, and downstream parties.

Monitor service compliance

Track whether suppliers and service teams are delivering compliant services against agreed obligations and thresholds.

Create board-ready evidence

Provide leadership with precise knowledge of accountabilities, continuity dependencies, and monitoring coverage.

Expose dependency risk

Make third-party and fourth-party relationships visible where downstream delivery can affect business continuity.

Close monitoring gaps

Align compliance activity with purposeful monitoring so operational oversight protects services instead of producing static reports.

Implications

CPS 230 turns service provider governance into a continuous operating discipline

Boards are not expected to manage day-to-day operational risk, but they are expected to understand accountabilities across entities that can affect operational risk, business continuity, and service provider arrangements.

Clearer accountability

Organisations can show who owns each control, obligation, and service warranty across internal and external delivery chains.

Better continuity governance

Critical business services can be monitored against the dependencies and suppliers that keep them operating.

Reduced third-party blind spots

Fourth-party and subcontracted delivery risks become visible before they become operational failures.

Conclusion

CPS 230 demands proof that operational risk controls work across the full service chain

Ikara helps regulated organisations align supplier obligations, service warranties, and operational controls into a live compliance model, giving executives and boards confidence that accountability gaps are visible and monitored.

Board visibility
Provider accountability
Continuous oversight

Make CPS 230 oversight provable.

See how Ikara can turn operational risk obligations into live service compliance.

Book a demo